High-risk systems must be explainable
Organizations must know which AI systems are used, who owns them, their risk class and what documentation exists.
LexiCompliance brings AI Act and MICA into one operating surface, with CRA coming: system register, risk classification, controls, evidence, signing and audit trail.
Organizations must know which AI systems are used, who owns them, their risk class and what documentation exists.
The Cyber Resilience Act requires traceability from product and vulnerability to controls, ownership and documented follow-up.
Crypto, tokenization and digital finance products must connect to risk, reporting, ownership and ongoing control.
This is built for teams moving from loose AI policy to practical control: legal, security, product, IT and leadership work on the same dataset.
Collect internal AI tools, third-party models, automated decisions and product features in one register.
Assess prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk and general AI with rationale and traceable decision.
Bridge regulatory requirements, internal controls, technical documentation and accountable owners.
Store documents, assessments, screenshots, approvals and audit notes on the right requirement.
Generate board report, gap analysis and regulatory basis with Ed25519/TSA-based integrity.
Keep control alive as models, vendors, use cases and legal requirements change.
The AI Governance category connects the technology regulations affecting modern digital organizations.
AIACTRisk classification, Annex IV documentation, human oversight, transparency, data governance and post-market monitoring.
CRAComingProduct overview, security requirements, vulnerability follow-up, vendor control and technical documentation.
MICAControls for digital assets, accountability, risk assessment, reporting and governance documentation.
Start with the system register, build evidence per requirement and get an audit-ready governance model before customers, the board or regulators ask for it.