AI governance for boards, compliance and technology teams

Control AI risk, documentation and compliance before regulators ask

LexiCompliance brings AI Act and MICA into one operating surface, with CRA coming: system register, risk classification, controls, evidence, signing and audit trail.

AI Act ready Model and system register Evidence per control TSA-signed audit trail
FrameworksAI Act + MICA
Primary riskHigh-risk AI
DocumentationAnnex IV
Control modelEvidence-driven
Why it matters now

AI governance is not a policy document. It is an operating requirement.

AI Act

High-risk systems must be explainable

Organizations must know which AI systems are used, who owns them, their risk class and what documentation exists.

CRA

Software becomes a compliance object

The Cyber Resilience Act requires traceability from product and vulnerability to controls, ownership and documented follow-up.

MICA

Digital assets need governance

Crypto, tokenization and digital finance products must connect to risk, reporting, ownership and ongoing control.

The platform

One workspace from mapping to audit-ready evidence

This is built for teams moving from loose AI policy to practical control: legal, security, product, IT and leadership work on the same dataset.

Inventory and classification

Register AI systems, vendors, use cases, data sources, owners, risk class and legal basis.

Controls and workflow

Assign ownership, set deadlines, follow up gaps and connect each requirement to concrete controls.

Evidence and signing

Upload policies, DPIAs, risk assessments, technical notes and decision records with full audit trail.

Workflow

How you get control without drowning the team

01

Map the systems

Collect internal AI tools, third-party models, automated decisions and product features in one register.

02

Classify risk

Assess prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk and general AI with rationale and traceable decision.

03

Map requirements to controls

Bridge regulatory requirements, internal controls, technical documentation and accountable owners.

04

Collect evidence

Store documents, assessments, screenshots, approvals and audit notes on the right requirement.

05

Report and sign

Generate board report, gap analysis and regulatory basis with Ed25519/TSA-based integrity.

06

Monitor change

Keep control alive as models, vendors, use cases and legal requirements change.

Three frameworks, one governance model

The AI Governance category connects the technology regulations affecting modern digital organizations.

AIACT

AI Act

Risk classification, Annex IV documentation, human oversight, transparency, data governance and post-market monitoring.

CRAComing

Cyber Resilience Act

Product overview, security requirements, vulnerability follow-up, vendor control and technical documentation.

MICA

MICA

Controls for digital assets, accountability, risk assessment, reporting and governance documentation.

Make AI governance operational

Start with the system register, build evidence per requirement and get an audit-ready governance model before customers, the board or regulators ask for it.